Home TECH & SCIENCE Is Social Capital trying to end run banks by creating IPO 2.0?

Is Social Capital trying to end run banks by creating IPO 2.0?

A filing from the investment firm could allow startups to go public without Goldman Sachs or Morgan Stanley

The investment firm Social Capital filed an S-1 form today to create what appears to be a financial vehicle that could allow startups to go public without the help of banks.

Working with Credit Suisse, Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. — which will raise $500 million by selling 50 million shares to undetermined investors — calls itself a “blank check company.” It has been “formed for the purpose of effecting a merger, share exchange, asset acquisition, share purchase, reorganization or similar business combination with one or more businesses.”

The new company said it has not identified any “business combination target,” but that it would be in the tech industry.

Most of all, Social Capital Hedosophia also has an intriguing group of managers, including Social Capital founder Chamath Palihapitiya as CEO and chairman; investor Ian Osborne as president; longtime tech execs Tony Bates as vice chairman and Phil Deutch as COO.

In addition, former Twitter COO Adam Bain has reappeared from the ether as a board member.

All to help companies reticent to go public do so:

According to the prospectus:

Despite playing major roles in the global economy and achieving significant financial scale, there has been a range of factors over the last several years that have led many technology companies, to remain private. U.S. technology IPOs have decreased from an average of approximately 40 IPOs per year from 2010 to 2015 to approximately 30 IPOs per year during 2015 and 2016.

Vast capital availability in the private markets, first from traditional venture capital, and now from multiple types of investors, including hedge funds, mutual funds, sovereign wealth funds and corporates, has enabled companies to stay private longer. Historically the decision to access public markets through an IPO has tended to be driven by a desire for growth capital and a venue for efficient pre-IPO shareholder liquidity; however, it is now a strategic business decision as the evolution in private markets now allows for sufficient access to growth capital. Furthermore, the private market has matured to establish well-developed secondary markets that are capable of providing liquidity to founders, employees and investors.

The traditional technology company IPO process, which has been largely unchanged for decades, has also acted as a driving force to deter private company management teams and their pre-IPO stakeholders from pursuing IPOs. We believe management distraction, a sub-optimal price discovery mechanism and the resultant longer-term aftermarket impact have discouraged private technology companies from pursuing IPOs. This tends to be true even for businesses that are otherwise operationally ready and of appropriate size to access the public markets.

Translation: Going public is a pain. And other tech bros are the answer!

Presumably, they would attract investors whom companies they target — the document refers to “unicorn” startups, which I would assume might include those such as Dropbox, Spotify — who are long-term players rather than the in-and-out ones that companies abhor in a typical IPO.

Thus:

An acquisition by a blank check company with a management team that is well-known to, and respected by, technology company founders, their current third-party investors and their management teams, we believe, can provide a more transparent and efficient mechanism to bring a private technology company to the public markets.

We intend to focus our target sourcing efforts on assessing companies that we believe would benefit significantly from being publicly-traded. Further, we believe that we are providing an interesting alternative investment opportunity that capitalizes on key trends impacting the capital markets for technology companies.

No comment, as is wont in these situations, from Social Capital, but it’s certainly an interesting new way to do an end run on big investment banks like Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley. Credit Suisse, which is typically third or fourth choice in IPO bakeoffs in tech, is an interesting choice to rope in.

Such an idea of changing the IPO market is not new in Silicon Valley and many companies have tried to go public new ways to avoid the typical process, which is often onerous and distracting.


Leave your vote

89 points
Upvote Downvote

Total votes: 0

Upvotes: 0

Upvotes percentage: 0.000000%

Downvotes: 0

Downvotes percentage: 0.000000%